linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: add imx8mp-libra-rdk-fpsc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250331-zippy-apricot-seriema-cbafe8@krzk-bin>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 10:15:58 +0200
From: "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Yannic Moog <Y.Moog@...tec.de>
Cc: "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, 
	"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, 
	"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>, 
	"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Benjamin Hahn <B.Hahn@...tec.de>, Yashwanth Varakala <Y.Varakala@...tec.de>, 
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "upstream@...ts.phytec.de" <upstream@...ts.phytec.de>, 
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>, 
	Jan Remmet <J.Remmet@...tec.de>, Teresa Remmet <T.Remmet@...tec.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: add imx8mp-libra-rdk-fpsc

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 06:03:05AM +0000, Yannic Moog wrote:
> > > +      - description: PHYTEC phyCORE-i.MX8MP FPSC based boards
> > > +        items:
> > > +          - enum:
> > > +              - phytec,imx8mp-libra-rdk-fpsc  # i.MX 8M Plus Libra RDK
> > > +          - const: phytec,imx8mp-phycore-fpsc # phyCORE-i.MX 8M Plus FPSC
> > 
> > And that's different than existing phycore som? You have entire commit
> > msg to explain that.
> 
> Yes, it is different to the existing phycore som.
> I explained the differences in the second patch which introduces the device trees.
> Would you like me to also add the explanation to this patch, or move it here from the second patch?

Some explanation should be here.


Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof