[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250331112205.2457d829@jic23-huawei>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 11:22:05 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eraretuya@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] iio: accel: adxl345: add single tap feature
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 23:08:34 +0000
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com> wrote:
> Add the single tap feature with a threshold in 62.5mg/LSB points and a
> scaled duration in us. Keep singletap threshold in regmap cache but
> the scaled value of duration in us as member variable.
>
> Both use IIO channels for individual enable of the x/y/z axis. Initializes
> threshold and duration with reasonable content. When an interrupt is
> caught it will be pushed to the according IIO channel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@...il.com>
A couple of build issues plus one comment inline
(I was going to tweak that thing whilst applying but the axis_en one is more complex).
drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c: In function ‘adxl345_is_tap_en’:
drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c:201:14: warning: variable ‘axis_en’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
201 | bool axis_en;
| ^~~~~~~
Not sure what intent was in this code.
drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c: At top level:
drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c:818:31: error: initialization of ‘int (*)(struct iio_dev *, const struct iio_chan_spec *, enum iio_event_type, enum iio_event_direction, bool)’ {aka ‘int (*)(struct iio_dev *, const struct iio_chan_spec *, enum iio_event_type, enum iio_event_direction, _Bool)’} from incompatible pointer type ‘int (*)(struct iio_dev *, const struct iio_chan_spec *, enum iio_event_type, enum iio_event_direction, int)’ [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
818 | .write_event_config = adxl345_write_event_config,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/iio/accel/adxl345_core.c:818:31: note: (near initialization for ‘adxl345_info.write_event_config’)
This is a change in the core to take a boolean for the last parameter. That one I'd have
just fixed up whilst applying if not for the axis_en one above.
>
> -static int adxl345_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int int_stat)
> +static int adxl345_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int int_stat,
> + enum iio_modifier tap_dir)
> {
> + s64 ts = iio_get_time_ns(indio_dev);
> struct adxl345_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> int samples;
> + int ret = -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (FIELD_GET(ADXL345_INT_SINGLE_TAP, int_stat)) {
> + ret = iio_push_event(indio_dev,
> + IIO_MOD_EVENT_CODE(IIO_ACCEL, 0, tap_dir,
> + IIO_EV_TYPE_GESTURE,
> + IIO_EV_DIR_SINGLETAP),
> + ts);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> if (FIELD_GET(ADXL345_INT_WATERMARK, int_stat)) {
> samples = adxl345_get_samples(st);
> @@ -428,9 +751,11 @@ static int adxl345_push_event(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int int_stat)
>
> if (adxl345_fifo_push(indio_dev, samples) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return 0;
I'm normally a fan of early returns but in this one corner case I think
ret = 0;
makes it more consistent with the other field matches.
It is just coincidence that the other one sets the value of ret inside
the if block.
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists