lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025033141-unwed-pleading-0f0c@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:39:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel_th: avoid using deprecated page->mapping, index
 fields

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:08:43PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 02:01:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:59:36PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > +cc Greg
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 09:36:40AM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > > Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 01:39:06PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> > > > >> Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> writes:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Thanks very much! Yeah just keen to get this in as we are moving towards
> > > > >> > removing these fields very soon.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> My understanding is that this is a part of larger effort to reduce
> > > > >> struct page to 8 bytes and an optionally dynamically allocated slightly
> > > > >> larger structure, is that correct? Just curious.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Could you take this in your tree? I think that'd work best.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Sure, will do.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, this doesn't appear to be in linux-next yet.  Could you confirm it's
> > > > > scheduled to hit the next merge window?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I'll send it to Greg once -rc1 is tagged.
> > >
> > > Right, is this ultimately handled in Greg's PR? Did you not send to him
> > > ready for the merge window?
> > >
> > > Or did you? I'm confused.
> >
> > I don't see it in my tree right now, is it in linux-next?  Nope, don't
> > see it there either :(
> 
> Yup... we did ask about this, quite a few times :)
> 
> Can you take direct, if you typically handle these from Alex?

I do normally take pull requests from him, yes.

Please resend it, with his signed-off-by or ack or whatever he wants to
give, and I'll queue it up after -rc1 is out.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ