linux-kernel - Re: [v4] mm/page_alloc: Consolidate unlikely handling in page_expected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fdba0c3b-dd83-4fb4-a8ad-950facc68127@web.de>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:15:17 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Ye Liu <liuye@...inos.cn>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Ye Liu <ye.liu@...ux.dev>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [v4] mm/page_alloc: Consolidate unlikely handling in
 page_expected_state

>>>             What are the requirements or steps to get involved?
>> You can try to improve communication skills as needed.
>
> I don’t see how I’ve offended anyone.

This might not have happened so far.

But some information from communication approaches can occasionally make
participants feel uncomfortable.


>          -- I was simply asking about the process to become a reviewer.
> What exactly is the issue with that?

There needs to be a desire to review selected items.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_review


> How did you interpret my message to warrant such a response?
I would like to help another bit with corresponding clarifications.
You can get further impressions and experiences from published review approaches,
can't you?

Regards,
Markus