[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd2acf53-de9f-42d9-a671-a67930c7be64@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 17:16:10 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org
Cc: linux@...ck-us.net, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, S32@....com,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....com>,
Thomas Fossati <thomas.fossati@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add NXP Software Watchdog
Timer
On 01/04/2025 10:46, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Yes, with one being the fallback.
>
> Like that ?
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> oneOf:
> - const: nxp,s32g2-wdt
> - items:
> - const: nxp,s32g3-wdt
> - const: nxp,s32g2-wdt
Yes
>
> Why a fallback is needed for this case ? It is exactly the same hardware
> for s32g2 and s32g3. Could it be:
Fallback is needed because it is exactly the same hardware.
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> oneOf:
> - const: nxp,s32g2-wdt
> - const: nxp,s32g3-wdt
This tells hardware is different.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists