[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e483c9c-2d74-49a3-af63-e3b5ae4e3656@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 16:23:51 -0500
From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sergio.collado@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)"
On 4/1/2025 4:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> commit c104c16073b7fdb3e4eae18f66f4009f6b073d6f
> Author: Sergio González Collado <sergio.collado@...il.com>
> Date: Sun Mar 2 23:15:18 2025 +0100
>
> Kunit to check the longest symbol length
>
> included <linux/kallsyms.h> which triggered
>
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:15:9: warning: "unlikely" redefined
> 15 | #define unlikely(cond) (cond)
> | ^~~~~~~~
> In file included from ./tools/include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
> from ./tools/include/linux/kernel.h:8,
> from ./tools/include/linux/kallsyms.h:5,
> from arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c:13:
> ./tools/include/linux/compiler.h:128:10: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> 128 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
>
> Remove "#define unlikely(cond) (cond)" to silence the compiler warning.
>
> Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@...il.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c b/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
> index 6c2986d2ad11..08cd913cbd4e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c
> @@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
> #include <stdarg.h>
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
>
> -#define unlikely(cond) (cond)
> -
> #include <asm/insn.h>
> #include <inat.c>
> #include <insn.c>
Sorry I didn't notice when I suggested to submit, but this same patch
was submitted a week ago.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/3/18/1606
Powered by blists - more mailing lists