linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: replace use of msleep(<20) with usleep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <a5b036d6-f5c7-4f99-8eee-948eb7bdb145@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:23:18 -0700
From: James <bold.zone2373@...tmail.com>
To: "Harry Wentland" <harry.wentland@....com>,
 Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>,
 sunpeng.li@....com, siqueira@...lia.com, alexander.deucher@....com,
 christian.koenig@....com, airlied@...il.com, simona@...ll.ch,
 aurabindo.pillai@....com, alex.hung@....com,
 "Shuah Khan" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/display: replace use of msleep(<20) with usleep_range for
 better accuracy


On Mon, Mar 31, 2025, at 11:20 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
> Agreed. Little timing changes often have unintended effects.
> I have no desire to change working code unless it's required
> to fix a real-life issue.
>
> Harry

Thanks for your explanation, and for taking the time to review.

Best regards,
James Flowers