linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tests switch-tracking: Fix timestamp comparison

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250401091422.GA115840@e132581.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 10:14:22 +0100
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tests switch-tracking: Fix timestamp comparison

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 01:18:31PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:

[...]

> I'm reminded of a Java check I wrote for this:

Nice short article.

> In clang -Wshorten-64-to-32 looks to cover this. I'll see if we can
> clean those warnings up a bit.

I checked a bit and seems GCC has no this flag, but it makes sense for
me to enable the flag for Clang.

> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>

Thanks a lot, Ian.

Leo