linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfs: add missing selections of CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250402162940.GB1235@sol.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:29:40 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>,
	Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: add missing selections of CONFIG_CRC32

On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 09:51:05AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On 4/1/25 6:02 PM, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > 
> > nfs.ko, nfsd.ko, and lockd.ko all use crc32_le(), which is available
> > only when CONFIG_CRC32 is enabled.  But the only NFS kconfig option that
> > selected CONFIG_CRC32 was CONFIG_NFS_DEBUG, which is client-specific and
> > did not actually guard the use of crc32_le() even on the client.
> > 
> > The code worked around this bug by only actually calling crc32_le() when
> > CONFIG_CRC32 is built-in, instead hard-coding '0' in other cases.  This
> > avoided randconfig build errors, and in real kernels the fallback code
> > was unlikely to be reached since CONFIG_CRC32 is 'default y'.  But, this
> > really needs to just be done properly, especially now that I'm planning
> > to update CONFIG_CRC32 to not be 'default y'.
> 
> It's interesting that no-one has noticed this before. dprintk is not the
> only consumer of the FH hash function: NFS/NFSD trace points also use
> it.
> 
> Eric, assuming you would like to carry this patch forward instead of us
> taking it through one of the NFS client or server trees:
> 
> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
> 
> for the hunks related to nfsd and lockd.

Please go ahead and take it through one of the NFS trees.  Thanks!

- Eric