[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250402192940.GB32368@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 21:29:41 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, mhocko@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
brauner@...nel.org, glider@...gle.com, mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] exit: move and extend sched_process_exit() tracepoint
On 04/02, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -937,12 +937,12 @@ void __noreturn do_exit(long code)
>
> tsk->exit_code = code;
> taskstats_exit(tsk, group_dead);
> + trace_sched_process_exit(tsk, group_dead);
>
> exit_mm();
>
> if (group_dead)
> acct_process();
> - trace_sched_process_exit(tsk);
I see nothing wrong in this change.
(and I think that the current placement of trace_sched_process_exit() was
more or less "random").
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists