[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf8994cc-b812-f628-ff43-5dae8426e266@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 23:02:50 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Erick Karanja <karanja99erick@...il.com>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
philipp.g.hortmann@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] staging: rtl8723bs: Modify struct rx_pkt_attrib
attribute bdecrypted
On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 10:34:22PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:16:42PM +0300, Erick Karanja wrote:
> > > > Standardize boolean representation by ensuring consistency,
> > > > replace instances of 1/0 with true/false where boolean logic is implied,
> > > > as some definitions already use true/false.
> > > > This improves code clarity and aligns with the kernel’s bool type usage.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Erick Karanja <karanja99erick@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> > > > index a389ba5ecc6f..fd04dbacb50f 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> > > > @@ -1358,7 +1358,7 @@ static signed int validate_80211w_mgmt(struct adapter *adapter, union recv_frame
> > > > u8 *mgmt_DATA;
> > > > u32 data_len = 0;
> > > >
> > > > - pattrib->bdecrypted = 0;
> > > > + pattrib->bdecrypted = false;
> > >
> > > but bdecrypted is a u8, not a boolean type. So setting it to "false"
> > > does not seem correct here, right?
> >
> > Is false different than 0?
>
> Does C guarantee that? I can never remember. I don't think it
> guarantees that a 'bool' will only be 8 bits, or am I mistaken there
> too?
>
> > Elsewhere there is an assignment to true.
>
> Was that in the original driver?
Yes:
git blame -L 436,436 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
554c0a3abf216 (Hans de Goede 2017-03-29 19:47:51 +0200 436)
prxattrib->bdecrypted = true;
> If this doesn't come from the hardware, then it's fine to make the
> change. If it does, it needs to be verified that the layout and bit
> values are identical.
Erick, you can see if the generated assembly code is the same before and
after the same. You can see that with
make drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.s
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists