lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250402-dilemma-korallen-0757411aa8fe@brauner>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:44:28 +0200
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jack@...e.cz, 
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	mcgrof@...nel.org, hch@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, rafael@...nel.org, 
	djwong@...nel.org, pavel@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, 
	will@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] efivarfs: support freeze/thaw

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 03:31:13PM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-03-31 at 14:42 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> [...]
> > +	pr_info("efivarfs: resyncing variable state\n");
> > +	for (;;) {
> > +		int err;
> > +		size_t size;
> > +		struct inode *inode;
> > +		struct efivar_entry *entry;
> > +
> > +		child = find_next_child(sb->s_root, child);
> > +		if (!child)
> > +			break;
> > +
> > +		inode = d_inode(child);
> > +		entry = efivar_entry(inode);
> > +
> > +		err = efivar_entry_size(entry, &size);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			size = 0;
> > +		else
> > +			size += sizeof(__u32);
> > +
> > +		inode_lock(inode);
> > +		i_size_write(inode, size);
> > +		inode_unlock(inode);
> > +
> > +		if (!err)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		/* The variable doesn't exist anymore, delete it. */
> 
> The message that should be here got deleted.  We now only print
> messages about variables we add not variables we remove.  I get that
> the code is a bit chatty here, but it should either print both the
> removing and adding messages or print neither, I think.

Ok, I added the deletion printk line back.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ