[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wmc3ufs4.fsf@DESKTOP-5N7EMDA>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:30:19 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Songtang Liu <liusongtang@...edance.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: Remove redundant READ_ONCE
Songtang Liu <liusongtang@...edance.com> writes:
> In the current code, batch is a local variable, and it cannot be
> concurrently modified. It's unnecessary to use READ_ONCE here,
> so remove it.
>
> Fixes: 51a755c56dc0 ("mm: tune PCP high automatically")
> Signed-off-by: Songtang Liu <liusongtang@...edance.com>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index e3ea5bf5c459..6edc6e57d4f8 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2661,7 +2661,7 @@ static void free_frozen_page_commit(struct zone *zone,
> free_high = (pcp->free_count >= batch &&
> (pcp->flags & PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER) &&
> (!(pcp->flags & PCPF_FREE_HIGH_BATCH) ||
> - pcp->count >= READ_ONCE(batch)));
> + pcp->count >= batch));
Nice catch!
Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> pcp->flags |= PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER;
> } else if (pcp->flags & PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER) {
> pcp->flags &= ~PCPF_PREV_FREE_HIGH_ORDER;
---
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists