lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0cf44936-57ef-42f2-a484-7f69b87b2520@uls.co.za>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 10:52:52 +0200
From: Jaco Kroon <jaco@....co.za>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: bernd.schubert@...tmail.fm, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
 joannelkoong@...il.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, trapexit@...wn.link,
 david.laight.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuse: Adjust readdir() buffer to requesting buffer
 size.

Hi,

On 2025/04/02 10:18, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 at 09:55, Jaco Kroon <jaco@....co.za> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I can definitely build on that, thank you.
>>
>> What's the advantage of kvmalloc over folio's here, why should it be
>> preferred?
> It offers the best of both worlds: first tries plain malloc (which
> just does a folio alloc internally for size > PAGE_SIZE) and if that
> fails, falls back to vmalloc, which should always succeed since it
> uses order 0 pages.

So basically assigns the space, but doesn't commit physical pages for 
the allocation, meaning first access will cause a page fault, and single 
page allocation at that point in time?  Or is it merely the fact that 
vmalloc may return a virtual contiguous block that's not physically 
contiguous?

Sorry if I'm asking notoriously dumb questions, I've got a VERY BASIC 
grasp of memory management at kernel level, I work much more in 
userspace, and I know there usually first access generates a page fault 
which will then result in memory being physically allocated by the 
kernel.  Generally I ignore these complexities and just assume that the 
"lower down" layers know what they're doing and I've got a "flat, 
contiguous" memory space, and that malloc knows what it's doing and will 
communicate with the kernel regarding which regions of virtual space 
should be mapped.  Love the learning though, so appreciate the feedback 
very much.

>
> This saves the trouble of iterating the folio alloc until it succeeds,
> which is both undeterministic and complex, neither of which is
> desirable.

Agreed.


>
> Thanks,
> Miklos

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ