linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add ST VD55G1 camera sensor binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d501bf2-a017-4c02-a96f-184a7d648b6a@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 11:41:25 +0200
From: Benjamin Mugnier <benjamin.mugnier@...s.st.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Sylvain Petinot <sylvain.petinot@...s.st.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab
	<mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sakari Ailus
	<sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] media: dt-bindings: Add ST VD55G1 camera sensor
 binding



On 4/2/25 11:38, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
> On 4/2/25 11:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/04/2025 10:34, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> On 4/2/25 09:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 01:05:58PM +0200, Benjamin Mugnier wrote:
>>>>> +    properties:
>>>>> +      endpoint:
>>>>> +        $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml#
>>>>> +        unevaluatedProperties: false
>>>>> +
>>>>> +        properties:
>>>>> +          data-lanes:
>>>>> +            items:
>>>>> +              const: 1
>>>>
>>>> Not what I asked. Now you miss number of items. Just use the syntax I
>>>> proposed. Or was there any issue with it?
>>>
>>> No issue I just misunderstood and thought const: 1 was impliying
>>> maxItems: 1. I'll add maxItems back.
>>
>> That's just longer way to express what I asked for. So I repeat the
>> question: why not using the syntax I asked for?
> 
> I guess I didn't understand what you asked for.
> May I ask you to write it ? That will help me a lot.

By 'it' I mean the binding.

> 
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 

-- 
Regards,
Benjamin