[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXv+5GsoHN5mVe_kEP+oAzxa9HqgfhoiDqvO3xiQurFrvQ3qA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 18:18:41 +0800
From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cc: chunkuang.hu@...nel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, airlied@...il.com,
simona@...ll.ch, matthias.bgg@...il.com, nancy.lin@...iatek.com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, djkurtz@...omium.org, littlecvr@...omium.org,
bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] drm/mediatek: Fix kobject put for component sub-drivers
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 4:36 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> In function mtk_drm_get_all_priv(), this driver is incrementing
^ mtk_drm_get_all_drm_priv()
> the refcount for the sub-drivers of mediatek-drm with a call to
> device_find_child() when taking a reference to all of those child
> devices.
Looking closer, that function is also missing a platform_device_put()
to match of_find_device_by_node().
> When the component bind fails multiple times this results in a
> refcount_t overflow, as the reference count is never decremented:
> fix that by adding a call to put_device() for all of the mmsys
> devices in a loop, in error cases of mtk_drm_bind() and in the
> mtk_drm_unbind() callback.
>
> Fixes: 1ef7ed48356c ("drm/mediatek: Modify mediatek-drm for mt8195 multi mmsys support")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> index a8fbccb50c74..6b31df587507 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c
> @@ -676,6 +676,10 @@ static int mtk_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> for (i = 0; i < private->data->mmsys_dev_num; i++)
> private->all_drm_private[i]->drm = NULL;
> err_put_dev:
> + for (i = 0; i < private->data->mmsys_dev_num; i++) {
> + /* For device_find_child in mtk_drm_get_all_priv() */
> + put_device(private->all_drm_private[i]->dev);
> + }
> put_device(private->mutex_dev);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -683,6 +687,7 @@ static int mtk_drm_bind(struct device *dev)
> static void mtk_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct mtk_drm_private *private = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int i;
>
> /* for multi mmsys dev, unregister drm dev in mmsys master */
> if (private->drm_master) {
> @@ -690,6 +695,10 @@ static void mtk_drm_unbind(struct device *dev)
> mtk_drm_kms_deinit(private->drm);
> drm_dev_put(private->drm);
>
> + for (i = 0; i < private->data->mmsys_dev_num; i++) {
Just FYI you can also declare the int within the for statement.
ChenYu
> + /* For device_find_child in mtk_drm_get_all_priv() */
> + put_device(private->all_drm_private[i]->dev);
> + }
> put_device(private->mutex_dev);
> }
> private->mtk_drm_bound = false;
> --
> 2.48.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists