[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24180e03-b608-4fb0-9215-b2bf1ea22bf0@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 15:09:31 +0100
From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/topology: Fix sched_is_eas_possible() prints
On 3/19/25 13:13, Christian Loehle wrote:
> Fix two EAS abort condition prints by adding the missing newline
>
> v2:
> Split series for backports, Cc stable and add fixes tags.
>
> Christian Loehle (2):
> sched/topology: Fix EAS cpufreq check print
> sched/topology: Fix EAS freq-invariance print
>
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Peter, Ingo,
Could someone pick these up pretty please?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists