[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z-6qZP00cj_K7x-_@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 17:33:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 2/4] x86/idle: Use MONITOR and MWAIT mnemonics in
<asm/mwait.h>
* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 06:28:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 08:08:06PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > Current minimum required version of binutils is 2.25,
> > > which supports MONITOR and MWAIT instruction mnemonics.
> > >
> > > Replace the byte-wise specification of MONITOR and
> > > MWAIT with these proper mnemonics.
> > >
> > > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Hmm... Is it only me who gets these, please?
> >
> > In file included from acpi/cstate.c:18:
> > asm/mwait.h:30:15: error: invalid operand for instruction
> > 30 | asm volatile("monitor %0, %1, %2" :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx), "d" (edx));
> > | ^
> > <inline asm>:1:16: note: instantiated into assembly here
> > 1 | monitor %rax, %ecx, %edx
> > | ^~~~~
> > In file included from acpi/cstate.c:18:
> > asm/mwait.h:95:15: error: instruction requires: Not 64-bit mode
> > 95 | asm volatile("sti; mwait %0, %1" :: "a" (eax), "c" (ecx));
> > | ^
> > <inline asm>:1:7: note: instantiated into assembly here
> > 1 | sti; mwait %eax, %ecx
> > | ^
>
> FWIW, revert fixes the issue.
All gone already, tomorrow's -next should be fine.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists