lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKiYCh7ukDoqc_toyn75=3wOM4WyOTGvogoOfdz9T_7Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:36:38 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Remo Senekowitsch <remo@...nzli.dev>, Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>, 
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...bosch.com>, 
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, 
	Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] device property: Add fwnode_property_read_int_array()

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 11:15 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:04:32AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 3:41 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 06:13:42PM +0100, Remo Senekowitsch wrote:
> > > > The rust bindings for reading device properties has a single
> > > > implementation supporting differing sizes of integers. The fwnode C API
> > > > already has a similar interface, but it is not exposed with the
> > > > fwnode_property_ API. Add the fwnode_property_read_int_array() wrapper.
>
> ...
>
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fwnode_property_read_int_array);
> > >
> > > I'm not sure about this. We have a lot of assumptions in the code that the
> > > arrays beneath are only represented by the selected number of integer types.
> > > This opens a Pandora's box, e.g., reading in u24, which is not supported by
> > > the upper layers..
> >
> > We can probably drop the export if it is just that which you object to.
>
> Yes, this is main point, but dropping it does not prevent from still using in
> the complied-in code. Is it possible to hide it better?

Don't put any declaration in the header and declare it in the rust
code? But lack of declaration generates warnings.

Also, all the backends will reject an arbitrary size. So your worry
about u24 or other odd sizes isn't really valid. But if you want to be
doubly paranoid for when we add a new firmware backend (shoot me now),
you could move this from the swnode implementation to the fwnode
implementation:

        if (!is_power_of_2(elem_size) || elem_size > sizeof(u64))
                return -ENXIO;

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ