linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <67eef72411bec_464ec29434@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 14:01:24 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Yuquan Wang
	<wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>, <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <rppt@...nel.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
	<lenb@...nel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	<rrichter@....com>, <bfaccini@...dia.com>, <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
	<david@...hat.com>
CC: <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<chenbaozi@...tium.com.cn>, Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>,
	<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<chenhuacai@...nel.org>, <kernel@...0n.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk

[add loongarch folks, cc linux-cxl ]

kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Yuquan,
> 
> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yuquan-Wang/mm-numa_memblks-introduce-numa_add_reserved_memblk/20250328-172428
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250328092132.2695299-1-wangyuquan1236%40phytium.com.cn
> patch subject: [PATCH v2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk
> config: loongarch-randconfig-002-20250328 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250328/202503282026.QNaOAK79-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250328/202503282026.QNaOAK79-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> 
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202503282026.QNaOAK79-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/container_of.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/list.h:5,
>                     from include/linux/module.h:12,
>                     from drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:10:
>    drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c: In function 'acpi_parse_cfmws':
> >> drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c:461:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_add_reserved_memblk' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>      461 |         if (numa_add_reserved_memblk(node, start, end) < 0) {
>          |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So it looks like loongarch was left out of the numa_memblks conversion:
87482708210f ("mm: introduce numa_memblks")

I think the update needed is something like this (untested):

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
index 2b8bd27a852f..cac16c827159 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/loongarch/Kconfig
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ config LOONGARCH
 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if MODULES
 	select NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
 	select NEED_PER_CPU_PAGE_FIRST_CHUNK
+	select NUMA_MEMBLKS
 	select OF
 	select OF_EARLY_FLATTREE
 	select PCI
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h
index b5f9de9f102e..bbf9f70bd25f 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h
+++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/numa.h
@@ -22,20 +22,6 @@ extern int numa_off;
 extern s16 __cpuid_to_node[CONFIG_NR_CPUS];
 extern nodemask_t numa_nodes_parsed __initdata;
 
-struct numa_memblk {
-	u64			start;
-	u64			end;
-	int			nid;
-};
-
-#define NR_NODE_MEMBLKS		(MAX_NUMNODES*2)
-struct numa_meminfo {
-	int			nr_blks;
-	struct numa_memblk	blk[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS];
-};
-
-extern int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
-
 extern void __init early_numa_add_cpu(int cpuid, s16 node);
 extern void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
 extern void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
index 84fe7f854820..57b21082e893 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <linux/efi.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/numa_memblks.h>
 #include <asm/bootinfo.h>
 #include <asm/loongson.h>
 #include <asm/numa.h>

Could someone from the loongarch side propose the fixups needed here so
Yuquan can land this patch?