[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250403053937.765849-8-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 13:39:37 +0800
From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: frank.li@....com,
l.stach@...gutronix.de,
lpieralisi@...nel.org,
kw@...ux.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com,
shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
festevam@...il.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/7] PCI: imx6: Save and restore the LUT setting for i.MX95 PCIe
The look up table(LUT) setting would be lost during PCIe suspend on i.MX95.
To ensure proper functionality after resume, save and restore the LUT
setting in suspend and resume operations.
Fixes: 9d6b1bd6b3c8 ("PCI: imx6: Add i.MX8MQ, i.MX8Q and i.MX95 PM support")
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
index 614ec3c79f9c..46864204146e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
@@ -138,6 +138,11 @@ struct imx_pcie_drvdata {
const struct dw_pcie_host_ops *ops;
};
+struct imx_lut_data {
+ u32 data1;
+ u32 data2;
+};
+
struct imx_pcie {
struct dw_pcie *pci;
struct gpio_desc *reset_gpiod;
@@ -157,6 +162,8 @@ struct imx_pcie {
struct regulator *vph;
void __iomem *phy_base;
+ /* LUT data for pcie */
+ struct imx_lut_data luts[IMX95_MAX_LUT];
/* power domain for pcie */
struct device *pd_pcie;
/* power domain for pcie phy */
@@ -1498,6 +1505,42 @@ static void imx_pcie_msi_save_restore(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool save)
}
}
+static void imx_pcie_lut_save(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
+{
+ u32 data1, data2;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX95_MAX_LUT; i++) {
+ regmap_write(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IMX95_PE0_LUT_ACSCTRL,
+ IMX95_PEO_LUT_RWA | i);
+ regmap_read(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IMX95_PE0_LUT_DATA1, &data1);
+ regmap_read(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IMX95_PE0_LUT_DATA2, &data2);
+ if (data1 & IMX95_PE0_LUT_VLD) {
+ imx_pcie->luts[i].data1 = data1;
+ imx_pcie->luts[i].data2 = data2;
+ } else {
+ imx_pcie->luts[i].data1 = 0;
+ imx_pcie->luts[i].data2 = 0;
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static void imx_pcie_lut_restore(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < IMX95_MAX_LUT; i++) {
+ if ((imx_pcie->luts[i].data1 & IMX95_PE0_LUT_VLD) == 0)
+ continue;
+
+ regmap_write(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IMX95_PE0_LUT_DATA1,
+ imx_pcie->luts[i].data1);
+ regmap_write(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IMX95_PE0_LUT_DATA2,
+ imx_pcie->luts[i].data2);
+ regmap_write(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IMX95_PE0_LUT_ACSCTRL, i);
+ }
+}
+
static int imx_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
{
struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -1506,6 +1549,8 @@ static int imx_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
return 0;
imx_pcie_msi_save_restore(imx_pcie, true);
+ if (imx_check_flag(imx_pcie, IMX_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_LUT))
+ imx_pcie_lut_save(imx_pcie);
if (imx_check_flag(imx_pcie, IMX_PCIE_FLAG_BROKEN_SUSPEND)) {
/*
* The minimum for a workaround would be to set PERST# and to
@@ -1550,6 +1595,8 @@ static int imx_pcie_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
if (ret)
return ret;
}
+ if (imx_check_flag(imx_pcie, IMX_PCIE_FLAG_HAS_LUT))
+ imx_pcie_lut_restore(imx_pcie);
imx_pcie_msi_save_restore(imx_pcie, false);
return 0;
--
2.37.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists