[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64b6d599-fe67-586a-e4b0-73d9b73499de@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:19:18 +0300
From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@....nxp.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org
Cc: linux@...ck-us.net, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, S32@....com, ghennadi.procopciuc@....com,
thomas.fossati@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: watchdog: Add NXP Software Watchdog
Timer
On 4/2/2025 6:49 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
[ ... ]
> +examples:
> + - |
> + watchdog@...0100000 {
> + compatible = "nxp,s32g2-swt";
> + reg = <0x40100000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&clks 0x3a>;
> + timeout-sec = <10>;
> + };
The S32G reference manual specifies two clocks for the SWT module: one
for the registers and another for the counter itself. Shouldn't both
clocks be represented in the bindings?
--
Regards,
Ghennadi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists