linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ad3530r.yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <430a8cbd-0193-4c2d-a471-434bacab5914@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:22:40 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: "Paller, Kim Seer" <KimSeer.Paller@...log.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
 <lars@...afoo.de>, "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 "linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: iio: dac: Add adi,ad3530r.yaml

On 03/04/2025 09:11, Paller, Kim Seer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kim Seer Paller <kimseer.paller@...log.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad3530r.yaml   | 99
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>  MAINTAINERS                                        |  7 ++
>>>>>  2 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> You got report about error in v2, which you did not respond to.
>>>>
>>>> You send v3... with same error. I don't understand this.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure, but based on the information provided, the errors might be
>>> unrelated to the driver, or I might have missed something.
>>
>> It's your job to respond to errors one way or another (unless there are
>> obviously false positives). Ignoring them means this is marked as
>> "changes requested".
> 
> My bad, I'll take note of that. I think the bindings error reported in v3 is
> still unrelated to the current changes.
Indeed, looks like. So in the future just respond to that email that you
checked it is not related or put some short note in the changelog of
that patch (---).

Best regards,
Krzysztof