[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d795a7e3-1558-49c9-85c8-4139c7699304@web.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 09:33:27 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [ARM] pata_pxa: Fix null-ptr-deref in pxa_ata_probe()
…
> Add NULL check after devm_ioremap() to prevent this issue.
Can a summary phrase like “Prevent null pointer dereference in pxa_ata_probe()”
be a bit nicer?
…
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_pxa.c
> @@ -223,11 +223,16 @@ static int pxa_ata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, cmd_res->start,
> resource_size(cmd_res));
> + if (!ap->ioaddr.cmd_addr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Can a blank line be desirable after such a statement?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists