linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip] x86/idle: Work around LLVM assembler bug with MONITOR and MWAIT insn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250403092218.GBZ-5TSiyjNRAcBxQo@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:22:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86/idle: Work around LLVM assembler bug with
 MONITOR and MWAIT insn

On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 11:06:02AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> The least common denominator is an insn with implicit operands. I'll
> post V2 that fixes it that way.

I guess.

You don't need to post a patch ontop - your previous one should be removed and
the whole effort can start all over again.

Maybe Ingo would let the test bots chew the patches a bit first before
applying them so quickly so that we can avoid this churn too.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette