[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41f9ad4b-382c-4945-82ac-ec38bee87937@web.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 11:52:42 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Henry Martin <bsdhenrymartin@...il.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Angelo Gioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Chad Monroe <chad@...roe.io>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Peter Chiu <chui-hao.chiu@...iatek.com>, Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@...look.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mt76: mt7915: Fix null-ptr-deref in
mt7915_mmio_wed_init()
…
> Add NULL check after devm_ioremap() to prevent this issue.
Can a summary phrase like “Prevent null pointer dereference in mt7915_mmio_wed_init()”
be a bit nicer?
…
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915/mmio.c
> @@ -651,6 +651,8 @@ int mt7915_mmio_wed_init(struct mt7915_dev *dev, void *pdev_ptr,
> wed->wlan.base = devm_ioremap(dev->mt76.dev,
> pci_resource_start(pci_dev, 0),
> pci_resource_len(pci_dev, 0));
> + if (!wed->wlan.base)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Can a blank line be desirable after such a statement?
…
> @@ -678,6 +680,8 @@ int mt7915_mmio_wed_init(struct mt7915_dev *dev, void *pdev_ptr,
> wed->wlan.bus_type = MTK_WED_BUS_AXI;
> wed->wlan.base = devm_ioremap(dev->mt76.dev, res->start,
> resource_size(res));
> + if (!wed->wlan.base)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Would the function “devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource” be applicable
in this else branch?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.14-rc6/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L87
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists