[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250403132121.GJZ-6LUVmn5S2BMF-A@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:21:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/x86: Clarify naming of CPU features for
/proc/cpuinfo
On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 06:40:00PM +0530, Naveen N Rao wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the script still processes cpufeatures.h but no
> longer "generates" names. It simply picks names within double-quotes if
> present. I don't think that is relevant for describing how the flags are
> named anymore.
It is relevant in a documentation file which is called cpuinfo.rst. Because
this thing is somewhat of a magic - and Xen has even more magic there - so I'd
like that file to explain the *whole* story.
> Regardless, please take another look at this and let me know if you
> think this still doesn't read right, or is missing anything (the script
> part, in particular). For reference, here is how the flag naming section
> looks like with this patch:
Tell you what: I'll take your text, put it in the file, edit it how I think it
should like and send you a patch for you to ack. This'll save us a lot of
time.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists