lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=Me15MyNJiU9E-E2R9yHZ4XaS=zAuETvzKFh8=K0B4rKPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 15:56:37 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, 
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>, Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>, 
	Emanuele Ghidoli <emanuele.ghidoli@...adex.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>, 
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] gpio: pca953x: fix IRQ storm on system wake up

On Thu, Apr 3, 2025 at 3:54 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...el.com> wrote:
>
> +Cc: Geert
>
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 02:07:05PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 18:38:38 +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
>
> > > If an input changes state during wake-up and is used as an interrupt
> > > source, the IRQ handler reads the volatile input register to clear the
> > > interrupt mask and deassert the IRQ line. However, the IRQ handler is
> > > triggered before access to the register is granted, causing the read
> > > operation to fail.
> > >
> > > As a result, the IRQ handler enters a loop, repeatedly printing the
> > > "failed reading register" message, until `pca953x_resume` is eventually
> > > called, which restores the driver context and enables access to
> > > registers.
>
> [...]
>
> > Applied, thanks!
>
> Won't this regress as it happens the last time [1]?
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-gpio/CAMuHMdVnKX23yi7ir1LVxfXAMeeWMFzM+cdgSSTNjpn1OnC2xw@mail.gmail.com/
>

Ah, good catch. I'm wondering what the right fix here is but don't
really have any ideas at the moment. Any hints are appreciated.

For now, I'm dropping it.

Bart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ