lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvN1TRaX4Wdu2zWcJpTJ-2FzONKdLZsamXXXpufzenakQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 11:59:13 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, 
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, 
	patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, 
	jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, 
	srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, 
	broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.12 00/22] 6.12.22-rc1 review

On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 at 20:55, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.12.22 release.
> There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.12.22-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.12.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Regressions on arm, arm64 and x86_64.

1)
The selftests rseq failed across the boards and virtual environments.
These test failures were also noticed on Linux mainline and next.

We will bisect these lists of regressions and get back to you.

* kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

2)
 The clang-nightly build issues reported on mainline and next.

 * S390, powerpc, build
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing

 clang-nightly: ERROR: modpost: "wcslen" [fs/smb/client/cifs.ko] undefined!
  - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYuQHeGicnEx1d=XBC0p1LCsndi5q0p86V7pCZ02d8Fv_w@mail.gmail.com/

3)
 The clang-nightly boot regressions with no console output have been
 reported on mainline and next.

 * boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug

  v6.14-12245-g91e5bfe317d8: Boot regression: rk3399-rock-pi-4b
     dragonboard-410c dragonboard-845c no console output
  - https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYve7+nXJNoV48TksXoMeVjgJuP8Gs=+1br+Qur1DPWV4A@mail.gmail.com/

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

## Build
* kernel: 6.12.22-rc1
* git: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
* git commit: 03f13769310a6563393c6bbbf9466936b50d5b0e
* git describe: v6.12.19-371-g03f13769310a
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.12.y/build/v6.12.19-371-g03f13769310a

## Test Regressions (compared to v6.12.19-348-gf5ef0867777d)
* arm, build
  - clang-nightly-nhk8815_defconfig

* dragonboard-410c, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag

* dragonboard-410c, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* dragonboard-845c, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - gcc-13-lkftconfig-debug

* dragonboard-845c, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* e850-96, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* powerpc, build
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing
  - clang-nightly-ppc64e_defconfig

* rk3399-rock-pi-4b, boot
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-hardening
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-full
  - clang-nightly-lkftconfig-lto-thing

* x86, kselftest-rseq
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_mm_cid_test
  - rseq_basic_percpu_ops_test
  - rseq_basic_test
  - rseq_param_test
  - rseq_param_test_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_compare_twice
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_benchmark
  - rseq_param_test_mm_cid_compare_twice

* x86_64, build
  - clang-nightly-allyesconfig

## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.12.19-348-gf5ef0867777d)

## Test Fixes (compared to v6.12.19-348-gf5ef0867777d)

## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.12.19-348-gf5ef0867777d)

## Test result summary
total: 126487, pass: 100173, fail: 7402, skip: 18837, xfail: 75

## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 139 total, 136 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 57 total, 54 passed, 3 failed
* i386: 18 total, 18 passed, 0 failed
* mips: 34 total, 33 passed, 1 failed
* parisc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* powerpc: 40 total, 35 passed, 5 failed
* riscv: 25 total, 23 passed, 2 failed
* s390: 22 total, 17 passed, 5 failed
* sh: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 4 total, 3 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 49 total, 48 passed, 1 failed

## Test suites summary
* boot
* commands
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-exec
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user_events
* kselftest-vDSO
* kselftest-x86
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-build-clang
* log-parser-build-gcc
* log-parser-test
* ltp-capability
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* perf
* rcutorture

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ