linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/6] pwm: stm32: Search an appropriate duty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:  <f0c50df31daa3d6069bfa8d7fb3e71fae241b026.1743844730.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Date: Sat,  5 Apr 2025 11:27:13 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
To: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] pwm: stm32: Search an appropriate duty_cycle if period cannot be modified

If another channel is already enabled period must not be modified. If
the requested period is smaller than this unchangable period the driver
is still supposed to search a duty_cycle according to the usual rounding
rules.

So don't set the duty_cycle to 0 but continue to determine an
appropriate value for ccr.

Fixes: deaba9cff809 ("pwm: stm32: Implementation of the waveform callbacks")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c | 12 +++---------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
index a59de4de18b6..ec2c05c9ee7a 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32.c
@@ -103,22 +103,16 @@ static int stm32_pwm_round_waveform_tohw(struct pwm_chip *chip,
 		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 
-		/*
-		 * calculate the best value for ARR for the given PSC, refuse if
-		 * the resulting period gets bigger than the requested one.
-		 */
 		arr = mul_u64_u64_div_u64(wf->period_length_ns, rate,
 					  (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * (wfhw->psc + 1));
 		if (arr <= wfhw->arr) {
 			/*
-			 * requested period is small than the currently
+			 * requested period is smaller than the currently
 			 * configured and unchangable period, report back the smallest
-			 * possible period, i.e. the current state; Initialize
-			 * ccr to anything valid.
+			 * possible period, i.e. the current state and return 1
+			 * to indicate the wrong rounding direction.
 			 */
-			wfhw->ccr = 0;
 			ret = 1;
-			goto out;
 		}
 
 	} else {
-- 
2.47.2