[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADYq+fYOvwmMGsjRDCm9AGeHRZW8si3xmFQ7jqEUq8CUQF1x3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 12:18:11 +0100
From: Samuel Abraham <abrahamadekunle50@...il.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andy@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [v3 0/1] Unnecessary code cleanup patches
On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 9:49 AM Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Apr 2025, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 01:02:19AM +0100, Abraham Samuel Adekunle wrote:
> > > The patchset modifies unnecessary duplicate NULL test on a
> > > value in an expression, when the value has been NULL tested in a
> > > previous expression.
> >
> > Nit, the subject line does nto have "staging:" in it, so I don't know
> > where this goes.
> >
> > Also, it really reads as "this is an unnecessary patch" :)
>
> Technically, in English, if you have a noun that is being used as an
> adjective and that noun is itself modified in some way, you should use a
> hyphen:
>
> Unnecessary-code cleanup patches
Yes this was what I intended to do. ;)
Thank you
>
> But something like
>
> Remove unnecessary code
Yes perfect.
>
> would have had no ambiguity at all. Also everything you are doing is a
> patch, so "patches" in the subject line doesn't seem very necessary.
>
Thank you, Julia.
I will update it as necessary.
Adekunle.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists