linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] Samsung S2MPG10 PMIC MFD-based drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73d99b656c405a19f75633796b696cc1aae71b90.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:29:06 +0100
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sylwester Nawrocki
 <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Chanwoo Choi	 <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Alim
 Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Michael Turquette
 <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Russell King	
 <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will
 Deacon	 <will@...nel.org>, Alexandre Belloni
 <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
 Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Will McVicker	
 <willmcvicker@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/32] Samsung S2MPG10 PMIC MFD-based drivers

On Fri, 2025-04-04 at 10:30 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2025, André Draszik wrote:
> 
> > This series adds initial support for the Samsung S2MPG10 PMIC using the
> > MFD framework. This is a PMIC for mobile applications and is used on
> > the Google Pixel 6 and 6 Pro (oriole / raven).
> 
> When you resubmit these, please note that MFD subjects take the form:
> 
>   mfd: <file>: Succinct change description starting with an uppercase char

I've followed your suggestion regarding the prefix when patches touch just one
file, but for patches that touch multiple files, I've kept the 'mfd: sec:'
prefix, e.g. in patch 18.

Hope that's OK.


Cheers,
Andre'