linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Support ROHM BD79104 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250405183654.6bd4a52d@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 18:36:54 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
 <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sa
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Javier
 Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Support ROHM BD79104 ADC

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025 09:19:19 +0300
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com> wrote:

> On 02/04/2025 09:07, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > Finally, I didn't find maintainer information for this driver from the
> > MAINTAINERS file. I would like to add myself as a reviewer for the
> > driver, so I can stay on track of the changes to it. AFAIR, having
> > R-entry without M-entry was not appreciated. Any suggestions how to
> > handle this?  
> 
> Jonathan, I suppose this, by default,  falls under the umbrella of your 
> IIO maintainership. Are you Okay with it if I'll add a maintainer entry 
> which sets you explicitly as a maintainer for this, and list myself as a 
> reviewer?

Absolutely.  I'm find with you adding yourself as either R or M.
If you go with M and anyone objects, we can have more maintainers ;)
If you go with R the catch all is fine. I've never insisted on everyone
adding entries to maintainers on basis the catch all means I get
them all anyway.

Jonathan


> 
> I suppose I could also add myself as a maintainer for this, but I am 
> unsure how well it would be received by the TI people ;)
> 
> > This series was based on the v6.14, but it should apply cleanly on
> > iio/testing - please let me know if I should rebase.  
> 
> Just realized I forgot to update this. The series is now based on 
> 543da6252b48 in the iio/testing. Nonetheless, I can still rebase if needed.
> 
> Yours,
> 	-- Matti