lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250405011000.460488-1-kamatam@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2025 18:10:00 -0700
From: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@...zon.com>
To: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <conor@...nel.org>,
	<f.fainelli@...il.com>, <hargar@...rosoft.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	<lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
	<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, <pavel@...x.de>, <rwarsow@....de>,
	<shuah@...nel.org>, <srw@...dewatkins.net>, <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 00/22] 6.1.133-rc1 review

On Thu, 2025-04-03 15:19:55 +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.133 release.
> There are 22 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 05 Apr 2025 15:16:11 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.133-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Complied with Clang 19.1.7 and booted on qemu-{arm,aarch64,x86_64}-system
and also our hetero-core aarch64 system. Found no regressions.

Tested-by: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@...zon.com>
 

Thanks,
Munehisa

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ