lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whVfxi4KRu-H=tsgSdoGdDz1bvu0_miJT0BTgAf4igpdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 12:04:04 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>, 
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] string fixes for v6.15-rc1

On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 at 10:54, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> - Add wcslen() to support more Clang libcalls (Nathan Chancellor)

Oh Christ.

Does clang not know how expensive function calls can be?

I really think the right fix here would have been to say "don't do
that", rather than make that function available.

When the function implementation is the stupid version, there is *no*
advantage to a function call.

In user mode, if you have

 (a) long strings

 (b) you use some optimized vectorized string library

 (c) you don't have the problems with function calls being potentially
expensive due to return prediction CPU workarounds

this compiler optimization may make sense.

But in the kernel, it *never* makes sense, because none of those three
issues are ever true.

So this change is just *stupid*.

And I'm not pulling stupid code. The one-liner rto just disable an
optimization that isn't an optimization is the right thing to do.

And if LTO has problems with that, then LTO needs to be fixed, dammit.
It's stupid without LTO, it's doubly stupid with extra
"optimizations".

               Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ