[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z_Les3Izgqkg85_x@agluck-desk3>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 13:06:11 -0700
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lockdep warnings from upstream build
On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 04:45:50PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> Several email threads on this over the past few days, but none
> seem to be getting much attention:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22%28%26q-%3Eelevator_lock%29%7B%2B.%2B.%7D-%7B4%3A4%7D%2C+at%3A+elv_iosched_store%22
>
> Since tomorrow is "-rc1" day I thought I'd add my lockdep splat to the
> mix.
>
> System is a 2-socket Icelake. Kernel built from:
>
> f4d2ef48250a ("Merge tag 'kbuild-v6.15' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild")
>
> Though I saw the same thing a few days ago, so the problem was
> introduced much earlier in the merge window.
Bisecting leads to this:
ffa1e7ada456 ("block: Make request_queue lockdep splats show up earlier")
Which may be doing what it says on the tin. But, I don't think I've
ever seen the "type 1 splats" on this machine even though every kernel
I build has lockdep enabled.
So it this showing up a real problem that happens to be very difficult
to hit? Or has it introduced a false positive?
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists