[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0636d6a8-7de9-4887-82eb-3f5fd8a208d5@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 08:43:08 -0500
From: Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: <hnagalla@...com>, <u-kumar1@...com>, <jm@...com>,
<jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
<jkangas@...hat.com>, <eballetbo@...hat.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/26] remoteproc: k3-m4: Use k3_rproc_mem_data
structure for memory info
On 3/17/25 7:06 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> The ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c driver previously hardcoded device memory
> region addresses and names. Change this to use the k3_rproc_mem_data
> structure to store memory information. This aligns with DSP and R5
> drivers, and can be refactored out later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> index d0ee7a8d460d..e83bef7cfddf 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_m4_remoteproc.c
> @@ -20,9 +20,6 @@
> #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> #include "ti_sci_proc.h"
>
> -#define K3_M4_IRAM_DEV_ADDR 0x00000
> -#define K3_M4_DRAM_DEV_ADDR 0x30000
> -
So two patches ago when you did this same thing for R5, you kept the
K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR define. But here you remove the adress #defines.
I don't care if you leave them or keep them, but just do the same
either way for both M4 and R5.
Andrew
> /**
> * struct k3_m4_rproc_mem - internal memory structure
> * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region
> @@ -38,15 +35,29 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc_mem {
> };
>
> /**
> - * struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data - memory definitions for a remote processor
> + * struct k3_m4_mem_data - memory definitions for a remote processor
> * @name: name for this memory entry
> * @dev_addr: device address for the memory entry
> */
> -struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
> +struct k3_m4_mem_data {
> const char *name;
> const u32 dev_addr;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct k3_m4_dev_data - device data structure for a M4 core
> + * @mems: pointer to memory definitions for a M4 core
> + * @num_mems: number of memory regions in @mems
> + * @boot_align_addr: boot vector address alignment granularity
> + * @uses_lreset: flag to denote the need for local reset management
> + */
> +struct k3_m4_dev_data {
> + const struct k3_m4_mem_data *mems;
> + u32 num_mems;
> + u32 boot_align_addr;
> + bool uses_lreset;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct k3_m4_rproc - k3 remote processor driver structure
> * @dev: cached device pointer
> @@ -56,6 +67,7 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc_mem_data {
> * @rmem: reserved memory regions data
> * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions
> * @reset: reset control handle
> + * @data: pointer to M4-specific device data
> * @tsp: TI-SCI processor control handle
> * @ti_sci: TI-SCI handle
> * @ti_sci_id: TI-SCI device identifier
> @@ -71,6 +83,7 @@ struct k3_m4_rproc {
> struct k3_m4_rproc_mem *rmem;
> int num_rmems;
> struct reset_control *reset;
> + const struct k3_m4_dev_data *data;
> struct ti_sci_proc *tsp;
> const struct ti_sci_handle *ti_sci;
> u32 ti_sci_id;
> @@ -336,14 +349,13 @@ static void *k3_m4_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, bool
> static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc)
> {
> - static const char * const mem_names[] = { "iram", "dram" };
> - static const u32 mem_addrs[] = { K3_M4_IRAM_DEV_ADDR, K3_M4_DRAM_DEV_ADDR };
> + const struct k3_m4_dev_data *data = kproc->data;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct resource *res;
> int num_mems;
> int i;
>
> - num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names);
> + num_mems = kproc->data->num_mems;
> kproc->mem = devm_kcalloc(kproc->dev, num_mems,
> sizeof(*kproc->mem), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!kproc->mem)
> @@ -351,17 +363,17 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> for (i = 0; i < num_mems; i++) {
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> if (!res) {
> dev_err(dev, "found no memory resource for %s\n",
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> if (!devm_request_mem_region(dev, res->start,
> resource_size(res),
> dev_name(dev))) {
> dev_err(dev, "could not request %s region for resource\n",
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> @@ -369,15 +381,15 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_of_get_memories(struct platform_device *pdev,
> resource_size(res));
> if (!kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr) {
> dev_err(dev, "failed to map %s memory\n",
> - mem_names[i]);
> + data->mems[i].name);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> kproc->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start;
> - kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = mem_addrs[i];
> + kproc->mem[i].dev_addr = data->mems[i].dev_addr;
> kproc->mem[i].size = resource_size(res);
>
> dev_dbg(dev, "memory %8s: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
> - mem_names[i], &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> + data->mems[i].name, &kproc->mem[i].bus_addr,
> kproc->mem[i].size, kproc->mem[i].cpu_addr,
> kproc->mem[i].dev_addr);
> }
> @@ -563,12 +575,17 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct k3_m4_rproc *kproc;
> + const struct k3_m4_dev_data *data;
> struct rproc *rproc;
> const char *fw_name;
> bool r_state = false;
> bool p_state = false;
> int ret;
>
> + data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + if (!data)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> ret = rproc_of_parse_firmware(dev, 0, &fw_name);
> if (ret)
> return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to parse firmware-name property\n");
> @@ -583,6 +600,7 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> kproc = rproc->priv;
> kproc->dev = dev;
> kproc->rproc = rproc;
> + kproc->data = data;
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rproc);
>
> kproc->ti_sci = devm_ti_sci_get_by_phandle(dev, "ti,sci");
> @@ -650,8 +668,20 @@ static int k3_m4_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct k3_m4_mem_data am64_m4_mems[] = {
> + { .name = "iram", .dev_addr = 0x0 },
> + { .name = "dram", .dev_addr = 0x30000 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct k3_m4_dev_data am64_m4_data = {
> + .mems = am64_m4_mems,
> + .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(am64_m4_mems),
> + .boot_align_addr = SZ_1K,
> + .uses_lreset = true,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id k3_m4_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss", },
> + { .compatible = "ti,am64-m4fss", .data = &am64_m4_data, },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, k3_m4_of_match);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists