[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <D90GO8QLAESS.PN6CB62OS6OY@linaro.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 15:03:33 +0100
From: Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>
To: "Alex Elder" <elder@...cstar.com>, "Bartosz Golaszewski"
<brgl@...ev.pl>, "Rui Miguel Silva" <rmfrfs@...il.com>, "Johan Hovold"
<johan@...nel.org>, "Alex Elder" <elder@...nel.org>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: <greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org>, <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, "Bartosz
Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: use new GPIO line value setter
callbacks
Hi Bartosz,
Thanks for the patch.
On Mon Apr 7, 2025 at 2:49 PM WEST, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 4/7/25 2:14 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>
>> struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return
>> an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using
>> them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Here is the commit that enabled these:
> 98ce1eb1fd87e gpiolib: introduce gpio_chip setters that return values
>
> This looks good. Thank you.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
Agree with Alex.
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@...aro.org>
Cheers,
Rui
>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c
>> index 16bcf7fc8158..f81c34160f72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/gpio.c
>> @@ -185,8 +185,8 @@ static int gb_gpio_get_value_operation(struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void gb_gpio_set_value_operation(struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc,
>> - u8 which, bool value_high)
>> +static int gb_gpio_set_value_operation(struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc,
>> + u8 which, bool value_high)
>> {
>> struct device *dev = &ggc->gbphy_dev->dev;
>> struct gb_gpio_set_value_request request;
>> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void gb_gpio_set_value_operation(struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc,
>> if (ggc->lines[which].direction == 1) {
>> dev_warn(dev, "refusing to set value of input gpio %u\n",
>> which);
>> - return;
>> + return -EPERM;
>> }
>>
>> request.which = which;
>> @@ -204,10 +204,12 @@ static void gb_gpio_set_value_operation(struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc,
>> &request, sizeof(request), NULL, 0);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "failed to set value of gpio %u\n", which);
>> - return;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> ggc->lines[which].value = request.value;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int gb_gpio_set_debounce_operation(struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc,
>> @@ -457,11 +459,11 @@ static int gb_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
>> return ggc->lines[which].value;
>> }
>>
>> -static void gb_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
>> +static int gb_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset, int value)
>> {
>> struct gb_gpio_controller *ggc = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>>
>> - gb_gpio_set_value_operation(ggc, (u8)offset, !!value);
>> + return gb_gpio_set_value_operation(ggc, (u8)offset, !!value);
>> }
>>
>> static int gb_gpio_set_config(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
>> @@ -555,7 +557,7 @@ static int gb_gpio_probe(struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev,
>> gpio->direction_input = gb_gpio_direction_input;
>> gpio->direction_output = gb_gpio_direction_output;
>> gpio->get = gb_gpio_get;
>> - gpio->set = gb_gpio_set;
>> + gpio->set_rv = gb_gpio_set;
>> gpio->set_config = gb_gpio_set_config;
>> gpio->base = -1; /* Allocate base dynamically */
>> gpio->ngpio = ggc->line_max + 1;
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 0af2f6be1b4281385b618cb86ad946eded089ac8
>> change-id: 20250331-gpiochip-set-rv-greybus-cd2365755186
>>
>> Best regards,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists