[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250407035752.1108927-2-chen.dylane@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:57:52 +0800
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
To: song@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
laoar.shao@...il.com
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf: Check link_create parameter for multi_uprobe
The flags in link_create no used in multi_uprobe, return -EINVAL if
they assigned, keep it same as other link attach apis. And the target_fd
sometimes will be initialized -1 such as probe_uprobe_multi_link in libbpf,
so do not check it at the current stage suggested by jiri.
Fixes: 89ae89f53d20 ("bpf: Add multi uprobe link")
Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@...ux.dev>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 5cd0af80f..0f4085e8d 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -3387,6 +3387,13 @@ int bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
/* no support for 32bit archs yet */
if (sizeof(u64) != sizeof(void *))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ /*
+ * The target_fd sometimes will be initialized -1 such as
+ * probe_uprobe_multi_link in libbpf, so do not check it at the
+ * current stage suggested by jiri.
+ */
+ if (attr->link_create.flags)
+ return -EINVAL;
if (!is_uprobe_multi(prog))
return -EINVAL;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists