linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/8] staging: sm750fb: change function naming style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMyr_bLkvFBTpYehG4fs-tqVE18YBf53okddU2=i7+Rr-zbCsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 06:57:38 +0100
From: Richard Akintola <princerichard17a@...il.com>
To: Samuel Abraham <abrahamadekunle50@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, 
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com, 
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] staging: sm750fb: change function naming style

On Sat, Apr 5, 2025 at 3:16 PM Samuel Abraham
<abrahamadekunle50@...il.com> wrote:

> This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
>   did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
>   Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
>   kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
>   needs to be done here to properly describe this.


Hi Samuel,

I sent the patches individually before, but I was instructed to send a
patch series.

Given that I didn't change any code, should I still add version number
and sending
patch series as the difference?

Richard Akintola