linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] crypto: sun8i-ce-hash - drop CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <115a9838-faf0-4607-87f9-c952b43bca78@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:26:17 +0300
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait.oss@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: clabbe.montjoie@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, wens@...e.org, jernej.skrabec@...il.com,
 samuel@...lland.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] crypto: sun8i-ce-hash - drop
 CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE_DEBUG ifdefs

Hi,

On 4/7/25 6:56 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:23:19PM +0300, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
>> 'struct sun8i_ce_alg_template' is always defined, even with
>> CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE_DEBUG disabled, so the ifdef guards
>> are not needed.
>>
>> Make sure the statistics have IS_ENABLED() checks instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait.oss@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c | 8 +++-----
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c
>> index b0959d8218cb..530c5181d73c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c
>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun8i-ce/sun8i-ce-hash.c
>> @@ -31,9 +31,7 @@ static void sun8i_ce_hash_stat_fb_inc(struct crypto_ahash *tfm)
>>   
>>   		algt = container_of(alg, struct sun8i_ce_alg_template,
>>   				    alg.hash.base);
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE_DEBUG
>>   		algt->stat_fb++;
>> -#endif
> 
> Should this go under IS_ENABLED as well?
> 

This is already part of an IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE_DEBUG) 
block, so no need to add an extra IS_ENABLED() check here. Just the 
ifdef was dropped:

	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE_DEBUG)) {
		struct sun8i_ce_alg_template *algt __maybe_unused;
		struct ahash_alg *alg = crypto_ahash_alg(tfm);

		algt = container_of(alg, struct sun8i_ce_alg_template,
				    alg.hash.base);
#ifdef CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_SUN8I_CE_DEBUG
		algt->stat_fb++;
#endif
	}

Thanks,

> Thanks,