[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vxjtdvy5vxhmqldgvt4mgeuor36gdjriiai7y3rej3tevuwisa@wpupxzhvc3tt>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:09:01 +0800
From: Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Yangyu Chen <cyy@...self.name>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: add RTC support for
Sophgo CV1800 series
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 09:26:23PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> From: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@...il.com>
>
> Add RTC devicetree binding for Sophgo CV1800 series SoC. The device is
> called RTC, but contains control registers of other HW blocks in its
> address space, most notably of Power-on-Reset (PoR) module, DW8051 IP
> (MCU core), accompanying SRAM, hence putting it in SoC subsystem.
>
I think this is a mfd device, so why not moving this into mfd subsystem?
Regards,
Inochi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists