[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <vjxnpbxvvh2vdjsamdznhrmrwwfwt5tjhugqik3ktueopajv6l@wmehdnowjvjq>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 09:41:32 +0200
From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: ad7606: add SPI offload support
Hi Jonathan,
On 05.04.2025 16:40, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2025 18:19:06 +0200
> Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> >
> > Add SPI offload support for this family.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@...libre.com>
> Hi Angelo,
>
> Code looks fine, but there is a TODO I'd like to know more about
> as it sounds 'ominous'.
>
> Otherwise this needs a dt review for patch 1 before I queue it up.
>
> Jonathan
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_spi.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_spi.c
> > index b2b975fb7fea4d1af6caef59e75ca495501bc140..b086122497eb22042171580878160334f56baa23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_spi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7606_spi.c
>
> > +static int ad7606_spi_offload_probe(struct device *dev,
> > + struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct ad7606_state *st = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > + struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> > + struct spi_bus_data *bus_data;
> > + struct dma_chan *rx_dma;
> > + struct spi_offload_trigger_info trigger_info = {
> > + .fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev),
> > + .ops = &ad7606_offload_trigger_ops,
> > + .priv = st,
> > + };
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + bus_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bus_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!bus_data)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + st->bus_data = bus_data;
> > +
> > + bus_data->offload = devm_spi_offload_get(dev, spi,
> > + &ad7606_spi_offload_config);
> > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(bus_data->offload);
> > + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "failed to get SPI offload\n");
> > + /* Allow main ad7606_probe function to continue. */
> > + if (ret == -ENODEV)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = devm_spi_offload_trigger_register(dev, &trigger_info);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, ret,
> > + "failed to register offload trigger\n");
> > +
> > + bus_data->offload_trigger = devm_spi_offload_trigger_get(dev,
> > + bus_data->offload, SPI_OFFLOAD_TRIGGER_DATA_READY);
> > + if (IS_ERR(bus_data->offload_trigger))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(bus_data->offload_trigger),
> > + "failed to get offload trigger\n");
> > +
> > + /* TODO: PWM setup should be ok, done for the backend. PWM mutex ? */
>
> I don't understand this todo. Perhaps some more details?
>
it was just an initial comment i did, when i started the things
was not clear.
Let me know if you can remove it, or i can send a v2.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
angelo
> > + rx_dma = devm_spi_offload_rx_stream_request_dma_chan(dev,
> > + bus_data->offload);
> > + if (IS_ERR(rx_dma))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rx_dma),
> > + "failed to get offload RX DMA\n");
> > +
> > + ret = devm_iio_dmaengine_buffer_setup_with_handle(dev, indio_dev,
> > + rx_dma, IIO_BUFFER_DIRECTION_IN);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(rx_dma),
> > + "failed to setup offload RX DMA\n");
> > +
> > + /* Use offload ops. */
> > + indio_dev->setup_ops = &ad7606_offload_buffer_setup_ops;
> > +
> > + st->offload_en = true;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists