[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250407034901-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 03:52:37 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Chandra Merla <cmerla@...hat.com>,
Stable@...r.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: don't allocate/assign airqs for
non-existing queues
On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 05:39:10PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> >
> > Not perfect, but AFAIKS, not horrible.
>
> It is like it is. QEMU does queue exist if the corresponding feature
> is offered by the device, and that is what we have to live with.
I don't think we can live with this properly though.
It means a guest that does not know about some features
does not know where to find things.
So now, I am inclined to add linux code to work with current qemu and
with spec compliant one, and add qemu code to work with current linux
and spec compliant one.
Document the bug in the spec, maybe, in a non conformance section.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists