linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: mux: ltc4306: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <16b14e5e-e5eb-5203-4cdf-44fbde9a5688@axentia.se>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 10:08:52 +0200
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
 Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
 Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: mux: ltc4306: use new GPIO line value setter
 callbacks

Hi!

2025-04-07 at 09:17, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> 
> struct gpio_chip now has callbacks for setting line values that return
> an integer, allowing to indicate failures. Convert the driver to using
> them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
> ---
> Peter: I know you've not been very active recently. If you prefer to
> just Ack it and let me take it through the GPIO tree, please do.

What normally happens is that I just Ack trivial things like this, and
then either Wolfram or Andi picks it. The risk of future conflicts in
this area (and cycle) should be low, so I don't think it really matters
if you pick it, but Wolfram/Andi should have first dibs, since it makes
for slightly neater PRs during the merge window.

Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>

Cheers,
Peter