[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250407044743-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 04:49:14 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Chandra Merla <cmerla@...hat.com>,
Stable@...r.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Eric Farman <farman@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] s390/virtio_ccw: don't allocate/assign airqs for
non-existing queues
On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 10:44:21AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Whoever adds new feat_X *must be aware* about all previous features,
> > > otherwise we'd be reusing feature bits and everything falls to pieces.
> >
> >
> > The knowledge is supposed be limited to which feature bit to use.
>
> I think we also have to know which virtqueue bits can be used, right?
>
what are virtqueue bits? vq number?
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists