[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <305582d4a9c0fc8f34f997a697081409dd2df273.camel@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 10:34:51 +0100
From: André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob
Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Sylwester
Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will
Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, Tudor Ambarus
<tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>, Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 27/32] rtc: s5m: add support for S2MPG10 RTC
On Sun, 2025-04-06 at 20:33 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> You just sorted the MFD headers in other patch, but here you break the
> sorting.
>
> For me patches resorting the addresses (as a separate patch) is churn,
> but sure. If you do this however, it means you really believe that it is
> worth to sort them, so you must keep that standard for all your further
> patches in that series.
Definitely. Not sure how that happened :-(
>
> Rest is fine, so with this fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Thanks Krzysztof!
Cheers,
Andre'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists