[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5555c2e5-029f-4c77-8c6b-3ded2b2f9d33@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 11:01:57 +0100
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bod@...nel.org>
To: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>, Robert Foss
<rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Barnabas Czeman <barnabas.czeman@...nlining.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@...aro.org>, David Heidelberg
<david@...t.cz>, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Some small preparations around CAMSS D-PHY / C-PHY
support
On 17/03/2025 07:45, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Wed Feb 26, 2025 at 3:47 PM CET, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On 26/02/2025 14:13, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> On Mon Dec 9, 2024 at 1:01 PM CET, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Since the hardware blocks on the SoCs generally support both D-PHY and
>>>> C-PHY standards for camera, but the camss driver currently is only
>>>> supporting D-PHY, do some preparations in order to add C-PHY support at
>>>> some point.
>>>>
>>>> Make the dt bindings explicit that the hardware supports both (except
>>>> for MSM8916) but also add a check to the driver that errors out in case
>>>> a dt tries to use C-PHY since that's not supported yet.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Luca Weiss (2):
>>>> media: dt-bindings: media: camss: Restrict bus-type property
>>>> media: qcom: camss: Restrict endpoint bus-type to D-PHY
>>>
>>> This series is still pending, both patches got reviews and no pending
>>> comments from what I can see.
>>>
>>> Would be nice to get it in for 6.15.
>>>
>> Yes this should be merged.
>>
>> Thanks for following up.
>
> Hi Bryan, hi Hans,
>
> 6.15 merge window is approaching fast, I wonder if this series was
> missed still.
>
As soon as possible.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists