[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a00856cc6a8b4e46f4ab8b1af11ce5fc1a31851.1744025467.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 19:31:35 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hughd@...gle.com
Cc: willy@...radead.org,
david@...hat.com,
21cnbao@...il.com,
ryan.roberts@....com,
ziy@...dia.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] selftests: mincore: fix tmpfs mincore test failure
When running mincore test cases, I encountered the following failures:
"
mincore_selftest.c:359:check_tmpfs_mmap:Expected ra_pages (511) == 0 (0)
mincore_selftest.c:360:check_tmpfs_mmap:Read-ahead pages found in memory
check_tmpfs_mmap: Test terminated by assertion
FAIL global.check_tmpfs_mmap
not ok 5 global.check_tmpfs_mmap
FAILED: 4 / 5 tests passed
"
The reason for the test case failure is that my system automatically enabled
tmpfs large folio allocation by adding the 'transparent_hugepage_tmpfs=always'
cmdline. However, the test case still expects the tmpfs mounted on /dev/shm to
allocate small folios, which leads to assertion failures when verifying readahead
pages.
As discussed with David, there's no reason to continue checking the readahead
logic for tmpfs. Drop it to fix this issue.
Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
Changes from v1:
- Drop the readahead logic check, per David.
---
.../testing/selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c | 16 ++--------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c
index e949a43a6145..0fd4b00bd345 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mincore/mincore_selftest.c
@@ -286,8 +286,7 @@ TEST(check_file_mmap)
/*
* Test mincore() behavior on a page backed by a tmpfs file. This test
- * performs the same steps as the previous one. However, we don't expect
- * any readahead in this case.
+ * performs the same steps as the previous one.
*/
TEST(check_tmpfs_mmap)
{
@@ -298,7 +297,6 @@ TEST(check_tmpfs_mmap)
int page_size;
int fd;
int i;
- int ra_pages = 0;
page_size = sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE);
vec_size = FILE_SIZE / page_size;
@@ -341,8 +339,7 @@ TEST(check_tmpfs_mmap)
}
/*
- * Touch a page in the middle of the mapping. We expect only
- * that page to be fetched into memory.
+ * Touch a page in the middle of the mapping.
*/
addr[FILE_SIZE / 2] = 1;
retval = mincore(addr, FILE_SIZE, vec);
@@ -351,15 +348,6 @@ TEST(check_tmpfs_mmap)
TH_LOG("Page not found in memory after use");
}
- i = FILE_SIZE / 2 / page_size + 1;
- while (i < vec_size && vec[i]) {
- ra_pages++;
- i++;
- }
- ASSERT_EQ(ra_pages, 0) {
- TH_LOG("Read-ahead pages found in memory");
- }
-
munmap(addr, FILE_SIZE);
close(fd);
free(vec);
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists