[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77d7aede-0e4a-4ef7-8b51-4028c1f677f6@icloud.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 20:19:55 +0800
From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@...oud.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] errseq: Eliminate special limitation for macro MAX_ERRNO
On 2025/4/7 20:05, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Patch looks like it will do the right thing, but why change this? Is
just make errseq implementation more generic.
> there some plan to change the value of MAX_ERRNO that I'm not aware of?
no.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists